17 March 04
Democracy in Action
There is no shortage of opinions about what the results of the Spanish elections mean, but roughly, the right claims that Spain has capitulated to terrorism, while the left holds that there is no connection between Iraq and Al Qaida. One of the most interesting pieces on this I’ve read is Juan Cole’s, who wonders why there has been such a disproportionate level of U.S. military spending on Iraq versus Afghanistan.
Much of the commentary in the Western press which accuses the Spanish of cowardice at the polls strikes me as patronizing at best. The exercise of the vote over the weekend was, exactly, just that: democracy. Democracy means you get to have a choice. The Spanish chose to dump the Partido Popular and a Prime Minister who led them to war against at least 85% of public opinion, probably higher. And those who might otherwise have stayed at home, resigned to the fact that their vote would mean little, were moved to vote.
Previous: Doubleplusgood Activism Next: Religion and Non-Violence

Seriously, what I think is so lacking in the commentary here in the US on this issue is the unwillingness to assume responsibility for the fact that when you go bullying your way around the world, some people are going to be so unhappy about it they’ll be willing not only to kill but to die for it. Then the rest of the world suffers. And the cycle repeats itself.
What’s so striking about Spain is that it was so OVERWHELMINGLY against participating in the war on Iraq. Zapatero is right to call it a disaster, because that’s exactly what it is, what it was predictably going to become.
I remember sitting having lunch in December just by the Reina Sofia, not 200 metres from Atocha, when the news of Saddam Hussein’s capture broke. The television played, over and over, the dehumanising images of the dishevelled Hussein, the prize of the Americans.
Is the world a safer place because of this? Hardly.