[Home]History of RunningDiscussionJuneThruDec03

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences


Revision 15 . . September 16, 2004 10:17 pm by Numenius
Revision 14 . . September 16, 2004 7:00 pm by Bdfgdgdsfgdfg
Revision 13 . . September 16, 2004 7:33 am by Numenius
Revision 12 . . September 16, 2004 5:31 am by 220.163.90.88
Revision 11 . . September 15, 2004 11:44 am by cain.ice.ucdavis.edu
Revision 10 . . September 15, 2004 11:43 am by 82-69-7-44.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk
Revision 9 . . September 14, 2004 11:39 pm by 202.96.189.xxx
Revision 8 . . September 14, 2004 6:31 am by 82-69-7-44.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk
Revision 7 . . September 14, 2004 12:39 am by CBL217-132-89-183.bb.netvision.net.il [general1]
Revision 6 . . July 6, 2004 12:32 pm by cain.ice.ucdavis.edu
  

Difference (from prior major revision) (no other diffs)

Changed: 1,44c1
Fred here... So, the home page would be more or less a frontispiece or 'dustjacket' providing information of our purpose and history, offering pointers to the list of 'participants' and either an embedded or external aggregator that will provide a path to 'posts [ÍÑ·¢ÖÎÁÆÍø] [ÉîÛÚ»úƱ]
[¿ìµÝ|Ëٵݹ«Ë¾] [ÍøÂçµç»°]
[Ë®¾§] [ÈÚ×Ê]
[µçÄÔάÐÞ] [³ö¹ú]
[¿ª¹ØµçÔ´] [Ä£¾ß]
[ÄÉÃ×] [ÎÛË®´¦Àí]
[ÎïÒµ¹ÜÀí] [VOIPÍø¹Ø]
[IPµç»°] [Èí½»»»]
[GK] [ÍøÂçµç»°]
[ÖÎÁÆÍÑ·¢] [ÖÎÁÆÍÑÍ··¢]
[ÍøÂçµç»°¿¨] [VOIP]
[VOIPÍøÂçµç»°] [ÒÆÃñ]
[Ļǽ] [Îå½ð]
[Ö¬ÒçÐÔÍÑ·¢] [ÍÑ·¢ÌØÐ§Ò©]
[Éú·¢²úÆ·][ÍÑ·¢²úÆ·]
[ÖÎÁư׷¢] [ë·¢ÒÆÖ²]
[Í··¢ÒÆÖ²] [ÊÓÆµ»áÒé]
[Æû³µ×âÁÞ] [ÌùÖ½]
[ÒûË®»ú] [²»Ðâ¸Ö]
[×ÔÌåë·¢ÒÆÖ²] [Ƥ·ô²¡]
[ΰ¸ç] [¸ßѪѹ]
[½»»»»ú] [×¢²áÏã¸Û¹«Ë¾]
[ÉîÛÚ»úƱ] [ÁùºÏ²Ê]
[ÊÓÆµµã²¥] [Ëٵݹ«Ë¾]
[¹ú¼Ê»õÔË] [±¨¾¯Æ÷]
[²èÒ¶] [²¹Æ·]
[Ôö¸ß] [׳Ñô]
[Çà´º¶»] [»¯×±Æ·]
[ÖÎ½ÅÆø] [ÓãÁÛ²¡]
[°×ñ°·ç] [ʵľµØ°å]
[ǩ֤] [¿¼ÇÚ»ú]
[ÉîÛھƵê] [ÓïÒôÍø¹Ø] [ip³¬ÊÐ]
[¹«»°] [ip¹«»°³¬ÊÐ]
[voipÔÚÏß½»Ò×ÖÐÐÄ] [¼¯Íŵ绰]
[±£½¡Æ·] [°åÀ¶¸ù]
[·ÀµÁÃÅ] [¼à¿Ø]
[°ü×°»ú] [µçÀÂ]
[ÃŽû] [´Éש]
[µç»ú] [¶ú»ú]
[ÎÀÐǵçÊÓ] [¼àÊÓÆ÷]
[±äѹÆ÷] [¶Ô½²»ú]
[´«¸ÐÆ÷] [µç×ÓÔªÆ÷¼þ]
[µ¶¾ß] [µØÌº]
[Öñ̼] [ipµç»°¼Æ·Ñϵͳ] [ip³¬ÊмƷÑϵͳ] of note' from participants individual weblogs. The front page, then, could be more or less 'static' with only minor occasional changes and updates, while the wiki will be open to all with its own divisions and structure (some set and some dynamic) for the development and expansion of the community and the discussion as it grows. (Yes, I'm just restating what you've told us to see if I get the picture). I think I see it, and if I'm seeing it correctly, it feels right.
Fred here... So, the home page would be more or less a frontispiece or 'dustjacket' providing information of our purpose and history, offering pointers to the list of 'participants' and either an embedded or external aggregator that will provide a path to 'posts of note' from participants individual weblogs. The front page, then, could be more or less 'static' with only minor occasional changes and updates, while the wiki will be open to all with its own divisions and structure (some set and some dynamic) for the development and expansion of the community and the discussion as it grows. (Yes, I'm just restating what you've told us to see if I get the picture). I think I see it, and if I'm seeing it correctly, it feels right.

Added: 193a151


Changed: 455,456c413,414
A lot has been going on here since I last checked in ... and, after catching up with the suggestions, I would very much like to contribute to the debate. As a preliminary statement, let me just say that when I first saw the list of topics, I thought to myself that there was no way I could write on the majority of them. Then, as the days would dwindle, closer to the date for posting, I was challenged and found myself writing pieces I never thought I was able or capable of writing. For me, the topic with its appended ¡°and place¡± helped me frame my piece ... but I can see how for others this might be a stumbling block.
And I agree with whoever said that we shouldn¡¯t feel pressed to write on every topic. Also, as someone else said ... there are many ways to post about a topic. A poem sometimes is more appropriate (as long as it¡¯s written for this post, and not recycled form old work), or an account from a new perspective -- that of a child or an animal, for example -- are all ways to stretch not only our imaginations and writing techniques, but also our connections to place. --Maria
A lot has been going on here since I last checked in ... and, after catching up with the suggestions, I would very much like to contribute to the debate. As a preliminary statement, let me just say that when I first saw the list of topics, I thought to myself that there was no way I could write on the majority of them. Then, as the days would dwindle, closer to the date for posting, I was challenged and found myself writing pieces I never thought I was able or capable of writing. For me, the topic with its appended “and place” helped me frame my piece ... but I can see how for others this might be a stumbling block.
And I agree with whoever said that we shouldn’t feel pressed to write on every topic. Also, as someone else said ... there are many ways to post about a topic. A poem sometimes is more appropriate (as long as it’s written for this post, and not recycled form old work), or an account from a new perspective -- that of a child or an animal, for example -- are all ways to stretch not only our imaginations and writing techniques, but also our connections to place. --Maria

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
Search: