[Home]DiscussAncestralPlace

HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences

Showing revision 5
Difference (from revision 5 to revision 5) (minor diff, author diff)
(The revisions are identical or unavailable.)
Discuss the current crop of posts on AncestralPlace here.


Funny...here we are again. All place writers writing about other-than ancestral places.

Is this kind of distance from one's own roots a prerequisite for writing about place? Do we need to be "out of the fishbowl" to write about the fish? Can Tuscans write about "being Tuscan" or do they just write about "being me?"

-- Chris


Not everyone in the world is a "pureblood". And not everyone in the world has lived exclusively in one place all their lives. Not everyone one in the world knows everything about their ancestors. Not everyone in the world can even define what "ancestral place" means. And not everyone in the world sees "place" as purely a physical location. The word "home" is not even a concrete noun... you can't always use an article like "the" or "a" with it, because it is not something you can touch. Yet to everyone it is a place.

--Miguel


So many of the contributions seem to be from people who are themselves, or have descended from immigrants. I wonder how many generations have to pass before you can "adopt" the local ancestors.

--Geoff



HomePage | RecentChanges | Preferences
This page is read-only | View other revisions | View current revision
Edited October 3, 2003 3:02 am by proxy6.syd.pacific.net.au (diff)
Search: